I disagree. The propagandists for the ruling class ('journalists') exacerbate tensions, but those tensions already exist. The core of the problem is that there are 'factions' within American society and the policy 'solutions' for one faction almost inevitably end up coming the root of a 'problem' for some other faction.
One size no longer fits all.
So the 'solution' of the ruling class mouthpieces is to declare that one faction is 'our democracy' and the other faction is 'the threat to democracy'.
John C. Calhoun predicted how this would all play out in the 1840s.
The first 'Civil War' was the 'solution' implemented by the Northern ruling class 'faction' against the agrarian ruling class 'faction' of the South.
The ruling class would rather that ordinary people engage in mass murder than give up one iota of power over the central government.
An excellent characterization of the Civil War. It was indeed a war between two governments and it was fought over power (not slavery or states' rights or the sacred "union"). That distinguishes it from a revolution, which is a war against the government.
But I don't see how Dissident Futurist is wrong. The media does create division, along racial lines, ethnic lines, and other lines, and the media creates phony crises ("Trans Genocide!") all for the purpose of advancing leftism and achieving the political goals of leftists.
I find it funny how most of the actual "division" is just being caused by journalists complaining about how "divisive" a candidate is.
No one:
The media: This candidate is incredibly DIVISIVE!
I disagree. The propagandists for the ruling class ('journalists') exacerbate tensions, but those tensions already exist. The core of the problem is that there are 'factions' within American society and the policy 'solutions' for one faction almost inevitably end up coming the root of a 'problem' for some other faction.
One size no longer fits all.
So the 'solution' of the ruling class mouthpieces is to declare that one faction is 'our democracy' and the other faction is 'the threat to democracy'.
John C. Calhoun predicted how this would all play out in the 1840s.
The first 'Civil War' was the 'solution' implemented by the Northern ruling class 'faction' against the agrarian ruling class 'faction' of the South.
The ruling class would rather that ordinary people engage in mass murder than give up one iota of power over the central government.
An excellent characterization of the Civil War. It was indeed a war between two governments and it was fought over power (not slavery or states' rights or the sacred "union"). That distinguishes it from a revolution, which is a war against the government.
But I don't see how Dissident Futurist is wrong. The media does create division, along racial lines, ethnic lines, and other lines, and the media creates phony crises ("Trans Genocide!") all for the purpose of advancing leftism and achieving the political goals of leftists.
To compromise with people who are wrong is to become less right.
The kayfabe of the Republican party of heel jobbers becomes less entertaining every cycle.
Meanwhile Michael Malice seems to be doing the Lord's work for this #NationalDivorce idea.