Can America be restored? I suppose step one would be to stop the Tidalwave of the willful destruction of the nation-state and the natos that created it. We haven't even been able to arrest that at all.
This would make for some interesting writing and things to think about.
- Can America be restored and if so how?
- An American Is a member of The Historic American Nation - How Should a Stateless People Proceed
Are a couple angles I could think of very quickly.
I am not a fan of MM because they play fast and loose with the facts. I appreciate their raising debate and challenging the ruling class narrative, but it does not mean he has the answer to why Lib Dem is so decrepit. It is a bit, too convenient and wide sweeping criticism to throw it all out—that is what Lib Dem has become does not mean that Churchill is responsible for it all. There is plenty of evidence that progressives here own it more.
His also masks the literal real villain in all this, FDR, who not only praised, and loved Fascism, as did his administration (until they didn’t), he engineered public opinion to get into the war, by goading Japan into an attack, thus purposely sacrificing his own citizens. FDR literally lied many times about Hitler in order to try to get public opinion to support his blood lust.
Maybe if MM would spend more time on that, we can get to a real discussion of these matters. The pot shots at Churchill playing with “toy soldiers” among other things, was rather unpersuasive. UK was a paper tiger by WW2, and Churchill, though a great souled man, was limited in his abilities. MM recent decline to debate a rather prominent historian was all I needed to confirm my cursory opinion on these matters.
I agree with you there. I dislike Churchill but FDR was indeed the real villain. Sean McMeekin’s Stalin’s War was shocking. The American pandering and groveling to the Bolshevik butchers was disgusting.
And can we talk about Abe Lincoln importing Irish and Germans to kill Southerners/plunder Southern homes and land?
> Darryl appears to have stoked the fires with his comments, drawing the ire of everyone from the Babylon Bee’s Seth Dillon to Josh Hammer of Newsweek. Smears of “antisemitism” and of besmirching the name of beloved Winston Churchill fly left and right. The claims of his antisemitism are even unfounded
Cooper is expanding the field in the narrative conflict. By blocking him Dillon and Hammer mark themselves out as defenders of the status quo (aka enemies). It seems my unspecific distrust of Hammer is fully justified. If we can't make gains we'll lose everything.
"I want someone to go on his podcast and give Tucker a copy of "The Authoritarian Personality."
- Pete Quinones
Absolutely. I read parts of it in high school, and didn't understand it until recently.
Give this a SHARE
Can America be restored? I suppose step one would be to stop the Tidalwave of the willful destruction of the nation-state and the natos that created it. We haven't even been able to arrest that at all.
This would make for some interesting writing and things to think about.
- Can America be restored and if so how?
- An American Is a member of The Historic American Nation - How Should a Stateless People Proceed
Are a couple angles I could think of very quickly.
Fantastic article and I completely agree.
Sorry but fascism is the revolutionary right, it is not progressive. It is futurist and socialist, but not progressive.
Restoring America to what it was. ??? What was it? Undoing the Reconstruction amendments seems a good start.
💩 💩
I am not a fan of MM because they play fast and loose with the facts. I appreciate their raising debate and challenging the ruling class narrative, but it does not mean he has the answer to why Lib Dem is so decrepit. It is a bit, too convenient and wide sweeping criticism to throw it all out—that is what Lib Dem has become does not mean that Churchill is responsible for it all. There is plenty of evidence that progressives here own it more.
His also masks the literal real villain in all this, FDR, who not only praised, and loved Fascism, as did his administration (until they didn’t), he engineered public opinion to get into the war, by goading Japan into an attack, thus purposely sacrificing his own citizens. FDR literally lied many times about Hitler in order to try to get public opinion to support his blood lust.
Maybe if MM would spend more time on that, we can get to a real discussion of these matters. The pot shots at Churchill playing with “toy soldiers” among other things, was rather unpersuasive. UK was a paper tiger by WW2, and Churchill, though a great souled man, was limited in his abilities. MM recent decline to debate a rather prominent historian was all I needed to confirm my cursory opinion on these matters.
I agree with you there. I dislike Churchill but FDR was indeed the real villain. Sean McMeekin’s Stalin’s War was shocking. The American pandering and groveling to the Bolshevik butchers was disgusting.
And can we talk about Abe Lincoln importing Irish and Germans to kill Southerners/plunder Southern homes and land?
> Darryl appears to have stoked the fires with his comments, drawing the ire of everyone from the Babylon Bee’s Seth Dillon to Josh Hammer of Newsweek. Smears of “antisemitism” and of besmirching the name of beloved Winston Churchill fly left and right. The claims of his antisemitism are even unfounded
Cooper is expanding the field in the narrative conflict. By blocking him Dillon and Hammer mark themselves out as defenders of the status quo (aka enemies). It seems my unspecific distrust of Hammer is fully justified. If we can't make gains we'll lose everything.
What do you propose to do about that?
That’s not my project.