This is a terrible idea for a number of reasons. It is basically Yarvin's advice about on ignoring politics applied to this niche issue. The idea that "engaging" somehow justifies and reinforces the opposing action is just to say that it's a good idea to pretend that things you don't like don't exist, because they will simply disappear on their own if you don't fuel them. There's no evidence of this working, ever, when one faction wields power and the other does not. If the power does need some sort of "fuel" it will just manufacture the fuel with or without you. By engaging there is at least the possibility of the development of a teachable moment.
It's also not advisable to block prominent female content creators because this cuts off lines of communication and cooperation. The fact is is, the exist, have influence, and are not going away. Pretending that they don't exist is simply not viable. Treating them as special and ignoring their "woman moments" also violates the meritocracy of the internet, as referenced in the article. If a man in tHe MoVeMeNt says something very bad, he will necessarily be corrected, and so should women. Simply ignoring problems is never a solution to problems.
The Bible explicitly teaches that it is the job of older women to train and correct younger women in the proper way to be women: how to love their husbands and children, manage the household well, and live wisely and in purity
Reminder that these declarations that men need to be more cool with women come at the same time as Isaac Simpson getting dragged by "rightwing" women for calling a tranny man a man
Simply put, to fix the modern world, men need power--absolute power--over women. Or rather, a well ordered hierarchy of men needs to be in charge of reshaping social dynamics between men and women. Every entropic tendency of women must be availed to suppression by law. This is, frankly speaking, not advantageous to women as a group--the very idea of women being a group, in the political sense, is something that should not be permissible--but, in a more general sense, it is not good for anyone, even women, for women to be at an advantage, no matter how much they have become incited to scream and kick about it, no matter how bad of examples of men they are willing to use as excuses for themselves.
Outstanding!!
My favourite line: “…given that arguing with a woman is effeminate behavior anyway.”
So true!
“Oh heavens! The simp has fallen in love with the E-Girl!”- Lord Redhawk
Every time we have to cycle back to “the right wing is losing women so become liberal!” I am reminded how horrible the system is we have
This needs to be posted in every workplace.
Redhawk my man, youre a much better writer than orator.
We shouldnt even be engaging with this like its a legitimate issue that needs to be discussed. Ignore, block, move on.
This is a terrible idea for a number of reasons. It is basically Yarvin's advice about on ignoring politics applied to this niche issue. The idea that "engaging" somehow justifies and reinforces the opposing action is just to say that it's a good idea to pretend that things you don't like don't exist, because they will simply disappear on their own if you don't fuel them. There's no evidence of this working, ever, when one faction wields power and the other does not. If the power does need some sort of "fuel" it will just manufacture the fuel with or without you. By engaging there is at least the possibility of the development of a teachable moment.
It's also not advisable to block prominent female content creators because this cuts off lines of communication and cooperation. The fact is is, the exist, have influence, and are not going away. Pretending that they don't exist is simply not viable. Treating them as special and ignoring their "woman moments" also violates the meritocracy of the internet, as referenced in the article. If a man in tHe MoVeMeNt says something very bad, he will necessarily be corrected, and so should women. Simply ignoring problems is never a solution to problems.
The Bible explicitly teaches that it is the job of older women to train and correct younger women in the proper way to be women: how to love their husbands and children, manage the household well, and live wisely and in purity
Reminder that these declarations that men need to be more cool with women come at the same time as Isaac Simpson getting dragged by "rightwing" women for calling a tranny man a man
Simply put, to fix the modern world, men need power--absolute power--over women. Or rather, a well ordered hierarchy of men needs to be in charge of reshaping social dynamics between men and women. Every entropic tendency of women must be availed to suppression by law. This is, frankly speaking, not advantageous to women as a group--the very idea of women being a group, in the political sense, is something that should not be permissible--but, in a more general sense, it is not good for anyone, even women, for women to be at an advantage, no matter how much they have become incited to scream and kick about it, no matter how bad of examples of men they are willing to use as excuses for themselves.
Sex wars are deeply seditious