If you are outside the mainstream slop cycle the perposterous contrivance of American-Russian enmity immediately becomes clear. No Russia ever pitted blacks against white to break northern white communities. The Russians didn't get us entangled in two wars in Iraq and conflict with the rest of the region.
It is an outrage. It mad that the Ukrainians go along with this but their leader is clearly fully onboard with globalist zionist hegomony. He is fully willing to let Ukraine be destroyed for the cause.
>No Russia ever pitted blacks against white to break northern white communities
All cultural marxist movements including civil rights, race riots, desegration came as exports to the West by soviet marxist professors. (Marxism does not originate from US)
>The Russians didn't get us entangled in two wars in Iraq and conflict with the rest of the region.
Russia/USSR special forces trained numerous jihadist groups to commit terrorism and fight against the US.
The cold war is over though. Putin doesn't hate Americans like the globalist scum do clearly. Surely you know this. Why are you splitting hairs? For what purpose do you engage in this polemic?
That's great, I'm glad Russia is no longer aligned with the international communist bloc of Venezuela, Cuba, Laos, North Korea and China in common solidarity to destroy the West, oh wait, they are.
Also there are about a dozen examples of Putin using cultural-marxist rhetoric to call Americans racist, colonizers, supremacist nazi sympathizers etc but I guess reality doesn't matter when you want to preserve the illusion that there's a based trad savior coming to rescue you.
So what do you propose? Russians are our op and Ukraine is our friend? NATO too? Russians saying shit doesn't subvert my people. Clearly that is the globalists and the zionists. You sound like you just want to have more enemies because historically the soviets were enemies with us.
You seem sorta semitic tbh. "Aryanbloodmemory" the based nazi telling us make war against Israels current biggest opponent. Huh?
I propose total Eurasian death. Ukrainians are my friends as they are a White supermajority nation fighting against an aggressive communist sympathizing death cult which seeks to erase their culture, freedom and existence. If your solution to "globalism" (Alex jones tier talking point) is supporting communism and the extermination of White nations then you are the enemy.
What crack you have to be on to believe that chabad crypto-commie Russia is Israel's enemy? Literally 0 merit to this theory.
If you use appeals to anti-semitism as an excuse to advocate for anti-white causes then you are the worst kind of subversive scum.
"Appeals to antisemitism". Are you talking to me? You didn't read what I wrote correctly or otherwise misunderstood because I definitely didn't do that lol.
It sounds like you've found some ultra niche little ideology. Have fun with that. I don't want to argue anymore I can tell this is going to be a waste of time for both of us. I am not here to make converts.
America has a vested interest in stoking divides on that side of the world, especially between Europe and Russia. Above that, they wish to paint the idea of Europe aligning with Russia being a betrayal of America, rather than the result of predatory American hegemony in the first place. And above all that is their desire to undermine a peaceable and mutually beneficial relationship between Americans and their progenitor, Europe. What a disaster it would be for the global ambitions of parasitical interests for the heartiest peoples on Earth to realize they can decide for themselves what the future ought to be.
That is, we need somebody of our own to broker these relationships, above and beyond the mechanisms of global capital as it currently exists. That is from where their power stems, and a real utility they serve, albeit ultimately to our detriment. We must be able to reject them wholesale, in part by replacing them with our own system of relations, over which they have no influence, ideally by definition. We will starve them of their power over us if we can fill these gaps ourselves, or otherwise make them inhospitable.
This does have the potential to backfire spectacularly though for the warmongers in the Regime.
In one sense, having more areas of conflict does mean more potential for a general conflict to spark. However, I'm also reminded of the 1904 Entente Cordiale, where a peace settlement between the French and English was only possible because the countries had such overlapping spheres of influences. This meant that the British and French more ability to bargain with each other and make concessions in one area while gaining benefits in an other. This compared to potential Anglo-Germans alliance, which never got of the ground because the Germans and British had so few common interests.
Thus, the reignitions of conflicts could be pretext to war, but also give Trump and Putin more shared interests to bargain over geopolitically. The broader scope of the negotiations could allow for a more clear delineation of spheres of influence. Of course, this likely means many regional actors would get screwed over, but this is the nature of geopolitical unfortunately.
The fast way to completely derail the Trump election mandate of America First is for the globalists administrative state to set the world on fire prior to January 20th. The same blob that spent 3 years trying to convince us that Trump was a Russian Manchurian candidate in 2016, will now try to convince us that to prove that theory wrong is for him to declare war on Russia in 2025.
The “Old World” has spent the last 3500 years burning itself to the ground and rebuilding it into whatever the latest conquering hordes ideologies demanded. Our founding fathers understood this, as George Washington stated in his farewell address, for America to avoid foreign entanglements as he clearly understood the cost of war. While this doesn’t mean a purely isolationist approach, it does mean involvement only in affairs that clearly are in the best interests of the country and its citizens. The problem now is who decides? The State Department, The Pentagon, the President or the Congress, the Administrative State or is it none of the above.
That is the opportunity presented to the incoming Trump administration to clarify for the first time in 100 years. Do we the people get to set the agenda through our elected representatives, or does the self interested oligarch class call the tune, as they are obviously paying the pipers.
Even without these conflicts I think the fact of Russia’s winning in Ukraine would make peace difficult. What would trump be willing to offer Putin that he does not already have? When Putin said their policy wouldn’t change regardless of who won in 2024 I think he had a similar calculation in mind, though Putin did blame the deep state in that statement.
Considering the outgoing administration is trying to antagonize the Russians and the incoming administration is pratically bound to cross nearly all the Chinese "red lines", it seems the Trump might just consumate the cooperation between China and Russia to top it all off.
Hopefully that much is suficient to proclude any escalation in the East Asia area.
If you are outside the mainstream slop cycle the perposterous contrivance of American-Russian enmity immediately becomes clear. No Russia ever pitted blacks against white to break northern white communities. The Russians didn't get us entangled in two wars in Iraq and conflict with the rest of the region.
It is an outrage. It mad that the Ukrainians go along with this but their leader is clearly fully onboard with globalist zionist hegomony. He is fully willing to let Ukraine be destroyed for the cause.
>No Russia ever pitted blacks against white to break northern white communities
All cultural marxist movements including civil rights, race riots, desegration came as exports to the West by soviet marxist professors. (Marxism does not originate from US)
>The Russians didn't get us entangled in two wars in Iraq and conflict with the rest of the region.
Russia/USSR special forces trained numerous jihadist groups to commit terrorism and fight against the US.
The cold war is over though. Putin doesn't hate Americans like the globalist scum do clearly. Surely you know this. Why are you splitting hairs? For what purpose do you engage in this polemic?
>The cold war is over though.
That's great, I'm glad Russia is no longer aligned with the international communist bloc of Venezuela, Cuba, Laos, North Korea and China in common solidarity to destroy the West, oh wait, they are.
Also there are about a dozen examples of Putin using cultural-marxist rhetoric to call Americans racist, colonizers, supremacist nazi sympathizers etc but I guess reality doesn't matter when you want to preserve the illusion that there's a based trad savior coming to rescue you.
So what do you propose? Russians are our op and Ukraine is our friend? NATO too? Russians saying shit doesn't subvert my people. Clearly that is the globalists and the zionists. You sound like you just want to have more enemies because historically the soviets were enemies with us.
You seem sorta semitic tbh. "Aryanbloodmemory" the based nazi telling us make war against Israels current biggest opponent. Huh?
I propose total Eurasian death. Ukrainians are my friends as they are a White supermajority nation fighting against an aggressive communist sympathizing death cult which seeks to erase their culture, freedom and existence. If your solution to "globalism" (Alex jones tier talking point) is supporting communism and the extermination of White nations then you are the enemy.
What crack you have to be on to believe that chabad crypto-commie Russia is Israel's enemy? Literally 0 merit to this theory.
If you use appeals to anti-semitism as an excuse to advocate for anti-white causes then you are the worst kind of subversive scum.
"Appeals to antisemitism". Are you talking to me? You didn't read what I wrote correctly or otherwise misunderstood because I definitely didn't do that lol.
It sounds like you've found some ultra niche little ideology. Have fun with that. I don't want to argue anymore I can tell this is going to be a waste of time for both of us. I am not here to make converts.
America has a vested interest in stoking divides on that side of the world, especially between Europe and Russia. Above that, they wish to paint the idea of Europe aligning with Russia being a betrayal of America, rather than the result of predatory American hegemony in the first place. And above all that is their desire to undermine a peaceable and mutually beneficial relationship between Americans and their progenitor, Europe. What a disaster it would be for the global ambitions of parasitical interests for the heartiest peoples on Earth to realize they can decide for themselves what the future ought to be.
That is, we need somebody of our own to broker these relationships, above and beyond the mechanisms of global capital as it currently exists. That is from where their power stems, and a real utility they serve, albeit ultimately to our detriment. We must be able to reject them wholesale, in part by replacing them with our own system of relations, over which they have no influence, ideally by definition. We will starve them of their power over us if we can fill these gaps ourselves, or otherwise make them inhospitable.
This does have the potential to backfire spectacularly though for the warmongers in the Regime.
In one sense, having more areas of conflict does mean more potential for a general conflict to spark. However, I'm also reminded of the 1904 Entente Cordiale, where a peace settlement between the French and English was only possible because the countries had such overlapping spheres of influences. This meant that the British and French more ability to bargain with each other and make concessions in one area while gaining benefits in an other. This compared to potential Anglo-Germans alliance, which never got of the ground because the Germans and British had so few common interests.
Thus, the reignitions of conflicts could be pretext to war, but also give Trump and Putin more shared interests to bargain over geopolitically. The broader scope of the negotiations could allow for a more clear delineation of spheres of influence. Of course, this likely means many regional actors would get screwed over, but this is the nature of geopolitical unfortunately.
The fast way to completely derail the Trump election mandate of America First is for the globalists administrative state to set the world on fire prior to January 20th. The same blob that spent 3 years trying to convince us that Trump was a Russian Manchurian candidate in 2016, will now try to convince us that to prove that theory wrong is for him to declare war on Russia in 2025.
The “Old World” has spent the last 3500 years burning itself to the ground and rebuilding it into whatever the latest conquering hordes ideologies demanded. Our founding fathers understood this, as George Washington stated in his farewell address, for America to avoid foreign entanglements as he clearly understood the cost of war. While this doesn’t mean a purely isolationist approach, it does mean involvement only in affairs that clearly are in the best interests of the country and its citizens. The problem now is who decides? The State Department, The Pentagon, the President or the Congress, the Administrative State or is it none of the above.
That is the opportunity presented to the incoming Trump administration to clarify for the first time in 100 years. Do we the people get to set the agenda through our elected representatives, or does the self interested oligarch class call the tune, as they are obviously paying the pipers.
Even without these conflicts I think the fact of Russia’s winning in Ukraine would make peace difficult. What would trump be willing to offer Putin that he does not already have? When Putin said their policy wouldn’t change regardless of who won in 2024 I think he had a similar calculation in mind, though Putin did blame the deep state in that statement.
Considering the outgoing administration is trying to antagonize the Russians and the incoming administration is pratically bound to cross nearly all the Chinese "red lines", it seems the Trump might just consumate the cooperation between China and Russia to top it all off.
Hopefully that much is suficient to proclude any escalation in the East Asia area.